SnippETS - 27 August 2008

Welcome

Welcome to another two weekly review of energy and environmental events and developments from both here in New Zealand and around the world. As always we hope you find our collection of stories to be of interest in what continues to be a rapidly evolving area.

Love them or hate them – the media are all pervading and Cousin Stanley never seemed to pay any notice until the day they found the moonshine still at the back of the disused cow shed – instant celebrity. Sometimes though you have to wonder how they get their storylines. For example, the recent article carried by the NZ Herald “Many think it’s too late for climate, survey finds” implied in it’s title that a substantial number held this opinion, when in fact it was only 10%. Perhaps a better headline might have been “Majority back climate change action” – and then perhaps our politicians might support stronger actions!!

And there is a lot happening that are positive. For example, a number of US cities are measuring and reporting Carbon Emissions – just as a number of NZ local authorities are - but why don’t we get to hear about them?

Over the ditch, the Australian Government is stepping in to manage the water resources of the Murray River, a measure that is an irritant to some, but a responsible action to the majority. Luckily the NZ water situation is unlikely to ever get this dire (that said, you could go surfing inland of North Canterbury right now), but the message here is that the sensible use of resources is something that has to be managed for the good of the majority and that there is both a time and a place for making the market play second fiddle.

“We live in constant fear of the adverse impacts of climate change” – words recently expressed by the Tuvalu Prime Minister. Examples of the REAL impacts of climate change can’t be any more tangible than to have your home disappear under a rising sea. A recent paper by the Climate Action Network Australia (CANA) is calling on the Australian Government to be prepared to accept refugees made homeless by Climate Change – a call that surely must be echoed in NZ as well, especially given our responsibilities to the island’s of Tuvalu.

A recent policy brief released at the World Water Week confirmed what most of us already probably suspected – that half of the food produced worldwide is wasted. Worse still, we are poisoning our oceans through fertilizer and nitrate run-off in order for us to produce the food we then go and waste. Who would want to be a fish……..

Perhaps Prince Charles has a part solution. As an ardent advocate of organic and sustainable farming, his way of using less fertilizer and nitrates has it’s positives. What would appear to get really under his crown though, is the prospects of widespread use of GM crops. Your thoughts Elizabeth?

Our bees are less abundant than they once were. Why is this? No one really knows for sure but Colony Collapse Disorder seems to be rampant in Europe and North America. As Albert Einstein is reported to have said “If the bee disappeared of the surface of the globe then man would have only four years to live. No more bees, no more pollination, no more animals, no more life.” There is a real sting or lack of, in all of this.

Many think it's too late for climate, survey finds
5:00AM Thursday August 21, 2008
By Angela Gregory
 

Ten per cent of New Zealanders believe it is too late to do anything about climate change, a new survey reveals.

The figure has alarmed campaigners trying to spread the message that everyone can do their bit for the environment.

Paul McElwain, strategy director of advertising company Publicis Mojo, presented the results of the online survey to a conference in Auckland yesterday.

The poll of more than 4000 household shoppers showed hundreds thought it was too late to act on climate change. One in 10 New Zealanders and about two in 10 Australians thought time had run out.

Mr McElwain said it was a thin line between people thinking it was too late and not taking action. As a result of doom messages, they might think, "Why bother?"

"There is the alarming prospect of losing these people, which is something we need to be concerned about."

The survey showed nine in 10 people believed immediate action was required. "It is time to move on from problems to solutions because consumers are crying out for that."

There was also a need for clarity and consistency of the message and for decisive leadership from business and Government.

The survey showed twice as many Australians than New Zealanders thought Governments needed to force the change.

"Most people thought they had a personal obligation to engage," Mr McElwain said. "Many are looking for leadership."

Few people did not believe there was a problem or that "going green" was not worth it or that what they did would not make a difference.

The survey showed Australians felt more knowledgeable on environmental issues than New Zealanders. About half the Australians felt educated and informed on environmental issues compared to about a third of the New Zealanders.

Half of the New Zealanders found it hard to make sense of the different environmental issues, compared to just over a third of the Australians.

Sixty per cent of New Zealanders did not consider themselves well read or informed compared to 45 per cent of the Australians.

Mr McElwain said nearly half those surveyed were willing to pay more for products and services to protect the environment, but the biggest barrier to purchasing was price.

Just over a third of the New Zealanders and nearly half the Australians selected environmentally responsible products.

Similar proportions trusted companies to tell the truth in environmental messaging.

Tim Rainger, team leader of public relations company Creo Sustain, said 80 per cent of people wanted companies to tell them what they were doing but nearly half did not believe what they were told.

Mr Rainger said there was emotional intensity around environmental issues and many lies had been told over the years.

Issues relating to sustainability were often complex and confused people wanted reassurance. One in two New Zealanders confused carbon-neutral with carbon-friendly, he said.

Claims by climate change sceptics needed more scrutiny. There was a need to be "brutally blunt" about the naysayers whose claims were not peer-adjudicated, he said.

Professor Ann Smith, of Landcare Research's CarboNZero programme, said anybody could claim to be carbon-neutral and no one knew what it meant. Those claiming to be carbon-neutral should be challenged but if they were under a certified scheme it could be taken as a fact.

Cheryl Bower, principal consultant at Energetics, said emission measurements were critical. Vastly different results could be produced depending on the standards used.



21 U.S. Cities to Measure and Report Carbon Emissions
OAKLAND, California, August 11, 2008 (ENS)
Some of the largest U.S. cities will report their greenhouse gas emissions for the first time in a program that will demonstrate to companies, investors and the general public how cities are dealing with the risks and opportunities climate change presents.

Twenty-one cities were announced today, with at least nine others expected to take part in the pilot project.

Some of the participating cities are large, such as New York, Las Vegas, New Orleans, Denver, and Portland, Oregon, while others are smaller such as Dubuque, Iowa; Saint Paul, Minnesota; West Palm Beach, Florida; and Rohnert Park, California.

Each city will assemble comparable carbon emission data within their jurisdiction's operations - fire department, ambulance and police services, municipal buildings, waste transport and other services the cities provide or activities over which they exercise budgetary control.

The Carbon Disclosure Project and ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability will help the cities to report their greenhouse gas emissions.

An independent not-for-profit organization founded in 2000, the Carbon Disclosure Project represents some 385 global institutional investors, with a combined asset base of more than $57 trillion. CDP collects key climate change data from more than 3,000 major corporations globally and has assembled the largest corporate greenhouse gas emissions database in the world.

Carbon Disclosure Project chief executive Paul Dickinson said, "Over 70 percent of total global emissions are generated from cities and if you don't measure these emissions, you cannot manage them."

"This is a vital step for city councils who wish to gain a better understanding of their own impact and by improving their understanding of risks and opportunities associated with climate change, best prepare their cities for a carbon constrained world," Dickinson said.

Cities will use the local government operations protocol coauthored by ICLEI and the California Climate Action Registry with input from expert stakeholders across the United States. The protocol details the policy framework, calculation methodologies, and reporting guidance for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from local government operations.

Then the cities will disclose this data to the Carbon Disclosure Project online reporting system.

"ICLEI's partnership with the Carbon Disclosure Project underscores how crucial standards, quantification methods and voluntary reporting are to local climate action," said Michelle Wyman, executive director of ICLEI USA, from her office in Oakland.

"This project provides the opportunity for transparency, and is essential in the emerging national and global policy dialogue as the priorities of local governments to achieve swift and deep reductions are identified and advanced by local government leaders," she said.

ICLEI USA is part of the worldwide ICLEI organization based in Toronto. The organization was founded in 1990 as the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, ICLEI.

New York's taxi fleet is being upgraded to cars that use less gasoline, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. (Photo by Ian Britton courtesy FreeFoto.com)

Said New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, "The City of New York joins the world's leading corporations in providing a complete, accurate accounting of its carbon emissions, the strategies it is employing to mitigate those emissions, and the results of its efforts through the Carbon Disclosure Project and ICLEI.

"This partnership between the world's major corporations and, increasingly, its cities, highlights the importance of the cooperative action needed to successfully counter climate change," the New York mayor said. "Working together, and with the best data, we can manage this problem, and leave our children and grandchildren a healthier and more sustainable planet."

In April 2007 Mayor Bloomberg released the first comprehensive inventory of greenhouse gas emissions in New York City's history. The inventory was completed as part of the ICLEI Cities for Climate Protection campaign.

The CDP Cities program is a voluntary disclosure process. Cities will submit their responses to CDP by October 31, 2008.

All responses will be announced and published in the first Carbon Disclosure Project Cities Report and ICLEI Local Action Network Report in January 2009.

Cities will be able to use the project to learn from peers on climate change management and the project will shed light on the level of awareness and preparedness of the cities on this issue.

The first 21 cities in the program are - Albany, New York; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Anchorage, Alaska; Arlington, Virginia; Burlington, Vermont; Denver, Colorado; Dubuque, Iowa; Edina, Minnesota; Fairfield, Iowa; Haverford, Pennsylvania; Las Vegas, Nevada; New Orleans, Louisiana; New York, New York; North Little Rock, Arkansas; Pacific Grove, California; Park City, Utah; Portland, Oregon; Rohnert Park, California; Saint Paul, Minnesota; Washougal, Washington; and West Palm Beach, Florida.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights reserved.

 
Water buyouts to ease Murray River anger
Jamie Walker
August 15, 2008
THE Government will offer to buy out the water entitlements of entire irrigation communities as Kevin Rudd moved yesterday to appease growing outrage at the plight of the lower Murray River.

The Prime Minister also caved in to demands for an external audit of water remaining in the drought-ravaged Murray-Darling Basin that spans Queensland, NSW, Victoria and South Australia.

Federal cabinet, meeting in Adelaide, a centre of the unfolding crisis, signed off on $50million in additional spending to accelerate the buyback of water rights, which has so far had minimal impact.

But the Opposition dismissed the package as "paper money", while South Australia's balance-of-power senator Nick Xenophon said it did not go far enough.

Under the deal, the federal Government will work with the states to acquire irrigation properties with large-scale water entitlements, especially in the upper reaches of the basin in NSW and Queensland.

This would build on a program trialed successfully in NSW, a spokeswoman for Water Minister Penny Wong said.

As well, Mr Rudd said the commonweath was willing to acquire the water entitlements of whole communities. But there was "no magic solution" to the emergency engulfing the lower Murray in South Australia, he warned. "I am not going to provide false promises, I am not going to provide false guarantees about there being some simple solution here," he said.

"I am trying to turn around a situation which has evolved over many years ... and we are dealing with the real consequences of climate change." Describing the river system as "very stressed", Mr Rudd said the Government was taking practical measures to accelerate and increase the buyback of water entitlements, which had been grossly over-allocated outside South Australia.

Central to the plan is expansion of a $350million offer for water rights in southern Queensland, where the headwaters of the Murray-Darling system are located. The $50million in additional funding approved by cabinet yesterday will take the program to $400million and extend it through NSW to the Menindee lakes, near Broken Hill, a back-up reservoir of drinking water for that town as well as Adelaide.

Mr Rudd played down the prospect of compulsory acquisition of water rights, saying "we are working within the market".

The effectiveness of the existing water buyback scheme was sharply drawn into question last week, when The Australian reported that it would return barely 10 megalitres to the river this year - the equivalent of 10 Olympic swimming pools.

Senator Wong's office said last night expenditure of the allocated funds would depend on the take-up of offers by irrigators and communities willing to cash in their water rights.

At the same time, pressure on the lower Murray would be eased by Mr Rudd's offer to co-fund with South Australia an expansion of Adelaide's new water desalination plant. The project, currently costed at $1.1 billion, is to provide 50 gigalitres of drinking water annually to Adelaide, about a quarter of the city's needs.

Mr Rudd said the commonwealth would partner the South Australian Government to increase the plant's capacity to up to 100 gigalitres.

Premier Mike Rann did not immediately commit to the expansion. His office said last night the state Government was considering the proposal, though Mr Rann noted yesterday there was provision in the design to accommodate it.

Mr Rudd said he wanted to end debate over whether there were untapped water reserves in the Murray-Darling Basin, which could be reallocated to top up the lower lakes at the mouth of the Murray. The two waterways, Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert, could become acidic within months unless inflows drastically increase.

Last week, the Murray-Darling Basin Commission backed up Senator Wong's grim assessment that there was not enough water in the river system to provide volumes required to fill the lower lakes.

The river management agency reported that publicly controlled reserves of water had fallen to 4800 gigalitres, just a fifth of stored capacity across the basin.

This has been challenged in South Australia by communities on the lower lakes and by some water experts, who dispute the accuracy of data supplied to the commission.

Mr Rudd said estimates of publicly and privately owned water reserves in the basin would be checked by private auditors. Updates would be released quarterly.

Senator Xenophon, whose vote is needed by the Government to pass legislation opposed by the Coalition, yesterday backed a proposal by the Greens to hold a Senate inquiry into the issue.

"I've got real concerns about what is being proposed," he said. "What we need is an independent forensic audit which details where the water is, who controls it and what the best use of the water is."

Opposition climate change and environment spokesman Greg Hunt accused Mr Rudd of "running up Penny Wong's white flag" on the lower lakes.

The latest Murray package was "paper money" which would not deliver results, he said.

Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists director Peter Cosier said Mr Rudd had recognised the magnitude of the crisis.

Inland Rivers Network coordinator Amy Hankinson said the additional money was a good sign but more was needed to arrest the decline of the Murray-Darling Basin.

Mr Rudd said federal cabinet had agreed to back the flooding of the lower lakes with seawater as a last-ditch measure to stave off acidification. The South Australian Government has begun site preparation for a weir, upstream of the lakes, to implement the measure.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24183641-11949,00.html
Tuvalu, a small island nation in the Pacific
make Poverty History report

Tuvalu, a small island nation in the Pacifc, has in recent years lost about one metre of land around the circumference of its largest atoll due to changes in storm conditions and rising sea levels.

“We live in constant fear of the adverse impacts of climate change. For a coral atoll nation, the sea level rising and more severe weather events loom as a growing threat to our entire population. The threat is real and serious, and is of no difference to a slow and insidious form of terrorism against us.” Saufatu Sopoanga, Prime Minister of Tuvalu

Tuvalu is one of the world’s lowest lying countries, with its highest point standing a mere four and a half metres above sea level. Half of Tuvalu’s population of 11,000 people live just three metres above sea level. “We live in constant fear of the adverse impacts of climate change. For a coral atoll nation, the sea level rising and more severe weather events loom as a growing threat to our entire population. The threat is real and serious, and is of no difference to a slow and insidious form of terrorism against us.” Saufatu Sopoanga, Prime Minister of Tuvalu

Salt-water intrusion reduces the land’s productive capabilities and has already affected communal crop gardens on six of Tuvalu’s eight islands. Some families have taken to growing taro (root staple) in metal buckets to avoid the saline soils. In addition, the increased coral bleaching from rising ocean temperatures is depleting local fsh stocks.

Tuvalu is the frst country where residents have been forced to evacuate because of rising sea levels – with nearly 3000 Tuvaluans already evacuated.“Taking us as environmental refugees is not what Tuvalu is after in the long run. We want the islands of Tuvalu and our nation to remain permanently and not be submerged as a result of greed and uncontrolled consumption of industrialised countries. We want our children to grow up the way we grew up in our own islands and in our own culture.”Tuvaluan Governor-General Sir Tomasi Papuas

Climate change is real and happening right now. Within our region, people living on low lying islands and river deltas are already experiencing negative impacts of rising seas and salt water inundation which contribute to crop losses, destruction of fresh water sources, and fooding. For these people climate change is already a stark reality and a terrifying future.

Pacifc and Torres Strait Islands including Tuvalu, Kiribati, the Murray Islands and the Carterets are succumbing to rising sea levels. Saltwater intrusion affects fresh water quality, leads to crop losses, and ultimately is forcing islanders to relocate from islands they have occupied for generations. Photos: Toby Parkinson/Oxfam

In the Western world we are slowly coming to demand more action on climate change.

In 2006 the world watched Al Gore’s flm, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’.

In 2007 the Nobel Peace Prize was jointly shared by Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

In the same year climate change played a signifcant role in the Australian Federal Election.

Most recently, in July 2008, Professor Garnaut released his Draft Report on climate change, outlining Australia’s response. Calling climate change a ‘diabolical policy problem…harder than any other issue of high importance that has come before our polity in living memory’, he urges Australia and the world to take urgent action before it is too late.

However, despite these events and the broad recognition that climate change is a defning challenge of our generation, we are still lacking suffcient public debate on climate change from development and poverty perspectives.

Within Australia, the focus still remains on largely domestic issues, without due consideration of issues affecting poor women and men in developing nations. Make Poverty History hopes that this publication and its national campaign can change the debate to better inform the public, business and decision makers to see the bigger picture – and act on climate change.

Funafuti, Tuvalu: The narrowest part of Fogafale islet is only 20 metres wide. During the king tides the water washes over from the ocean to the lagoon. © Jocelyn Carlin/Panos

Climate change is already beginning to undermine poverty reduction and sustainable development objectives under the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and is set to get worse.

It cuts across all development issues and seriously threatens the lives and livelihoods of poor people around the world.

It affects all sectors of development, from food and water security, to health and sanitation, to displacement and migration, and confict and disasters.

Developing countries are more vulnerable to climate change because they are more dependent on their natural resources than developed countries, and have a lower capacity to cope with environmental hazards and shocks.

The debates on climate change, and Australia’s reponse, must include issues of social justice, equity and responsibility, in addition to science and economics.

For poor people in developing countries who currently lack a voice these issues are a matterof life and death.

Their voices must be heard in order for international policy to refect their real needs, and not just the economic arguments. The reality is that climate change is one of the biggest moral and ethical issues facing our planet today.

How we rise to the challenge of asking andanswering the ethical questions, will play a signifcant part in determining the future of the world’s poor.


To read the full report click HERE (pdf)
Half of All Food Produced Worldwide is Wasted
STOCKHOLM, Sweden, August 22, 2008 (ENS)
Tremendous quantities of food are wasted after production - discarded in processing, transport, supermarkets and kitchens - and this wasted food is also wasted water, finds a policy brief released Thursday at World Water Week in Stockholm.

The brief authored by the Stockholm International Water Institute, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, and the International Water Management Institute shows that the current food crisis is less a crisis of production than a crisis of waste. Tossing food away is like leaving the tap running, the authors say.

"More than enough food is produced to feed a healthy global population. Distribution and access to food is a problem - many are hungry, while at the same time many overeat," the brief states. But, it says, "we are providing food to take care of not only our necessary consumption but also our wasteful habits."

A traditional Arab irrigation system in the United Arab Emirates where every drop is precious. (Photo by Zat3OoOr!)

"As much as half of the water used to grow food globally may be lost or wasted," says Dr. Charlotte de Fraiture, a researcher at IWMI. "Curbing these losses and improving water productivity provides win-win opportunities for farmers, business, ecosystems, and the global hungry."

"An effective water-saving strategy requires that minimizing food wastage is firmly placed on the political agenda," she said.

In the United States, for instance, as much as 30 percent of food, worth some US$48.3 billion, is thrown away. "That's like leaving the tap running and pouring 40 trillion liters of water into the garbage can - enough water to meet the household needs of 500 million people," says the report.

The policy brief, "Saving Water: From Field to Fork - Curbing Losses and Wastage in the Food Chain," calls on governments to reduce by half, by 2025, the amount of food that is wasted after it is grown and outlines attainable steps for this be achieved.

Through international trade, for instance, savings in one country might benefit communities in other parts of the world.

"Unless we change our practices, water will be a key constraint to food production in the future," said Dr. Pasquale Steduto of FAO.

Water losses accumulate as food is wasted before and after it reaches the consumer.

In poorer countries, a majority of uneaten food is lost before it has a chance to be consumed. Depending on the crop, an estimated 15 to 35 percent of food may be lost in the field. Another 10 to15 percent is discarded during processing, transport and storage, the brief states.

Wasted food on the garbage line at a U.S. college (Photo by Jonathan Bloom)
In richer countries, production is more efficient but waste is greater, the report says. "People toss the food they buy and all the resources used to grow, ship and produce the food along with it."

As this wasted food rots in landfills it generates methane, a gas that causes climate change and is 21 times more potent than carbon dioxide.

The report stresses that the magnitude of current food losses presents both challenges and opportunities.

"Improving water productivity and reducing the quantity of food that is wasted can enable us to provide a better diet for the poor and enough food for growing populations," says Professor Jan Lundqvist of the Stockholm International Water Institute.

"Reaching the target we propose, a 50 percent reduction of losses and wastage in the production and consumption chain is a necessary and achievable goal," said Lundqvist.

World Water Week is hosted by the Stockholm International Water Institute, a policy institute that contributes to international efforts to combat the world's escalating water crisis.

The annual event features the award of the 2008 Stockholm Water Prize, which this year was bestowed upon Professor John Anthony Allan from King's College London, who introduced the "virtual water" concept.

Virtual water is a measurement of how water is embedded in the production and trade of food and consumer products and is the concept on which the policy brief, "Saving Water: From Field to Fork - Curbing Losses and Wastage in the Food Chain," is based.

While studying water scarcity in the Middle East, Professor Allan developed the theory of using virtual water import, via food, as an alternative water "source" to reduce pressure on the scarcely available domestic water resources there and in other water-short regions.

Professor John Anthony Allen (Photo courtesy SIWI)

By explaining how and why nations such as the United States, Argentina and Brazil export billions of liters of water each year, while others like Japan, Egypt and Italy import billions, the virtual water concept has opened the door to more productive water use, said the Water Prize Nominating Committee.

National, regional and global water and food security, for example, can be enhanced when water intensive commodities are traded from places where they are economically viable to produce to places where they are not.

"The improved understanding of trade and water management issues on local, regional and global scales are of the highest relevance for the successful and sustainable use of water resources," the committee said.

The Stockholm Water Prize is a global award founded in 1990 and presented annually by the Stockholm Water Foundation to an individual, organization or institution for outstanding water-related activities. The activities can be within fields like education and awareness-raising, human and international relations, research, water management and water-related aid.

The Stockholm Water Prize Laureate receives US$150,000 and a crystal sculpture. H.M. King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden is the Patron of the Stockholm Water Prize.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights reserved.

Pollution leaves seas to die
Lewis Smith
August 16, 2008
AQUATIC dead zones, stretches of water where little or nothing can survive, have increased across the world by a third in little over a decade.

More than 400 dead zones were identified last year, covering a total area of 64,700sq km, about the size of New Zealand.

The dead zones suffer from hypoxia, a lack of oxygen, which scientists believe is caused by fertilisers washing off the land. When hypoxia sets in, it can drive away tens of thousands of marine animals and, in severe cases, kill them.

Scientists believe that hypoxia ranks with overfishing and habitat destruction as one of the most damaging problems facing sealife.

Since the 1960s, when there were 49 dead zones, the number has increased rapidly and from 1995 to last year it rose from 305 to 405. Among the most alarming outbreaks of hypoxia were in fishing areas of the Baltic, the Black Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and the East China Sea. One of the largest was identified at the mouth of the Mississippi River and was 22,000sq km.

"Dead zones were once rare. Now they're commonplace. There are more of them in more places," said Robert Diaz, of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, in the US.

In a paper published in the journal Science, Professor Diaz and his colleague Rutger Rosenberg, of the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, said that dead zones "now rank with overfishing, habitat loss and harmful algal blooms as major global environmental problems".

They wrote: "There is no other variable of such ecological importance to coastal marine ecosystems that has changed so drastically over such a short time."

According to the scientists, the dead zones occur when nutrients used to enhance farmland, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, wash into the sea and fertilise huge blooms of algae. When dead, the algae are eaten by bacteria, which absorb oxygen from the water as the algae decompose.

Prince Charles warns GM crops risk causing the biggest-ever environmental disaster
By Jeff Randall

The mass development of genetically modified crops risks causing the world's worst environmental disaster, The Prince of Wales has warned.

In his most outspoken intervention on the issue of GM food, the Prince said that multi-national companies were conducting an experiment with nature which had gone "seriously wrong".

The Prince, in an exclusive interview with the Daily Telegraph, also expressed the fear that food would run out because of the damage being wreaked on the earth's soil by scientists' research.

He accused firms of conducting a "gigantic experiment I think with nature and the whole of humanity which has gone seriously wrong".

"Why else are we facing all these challenges, climate change and everything?".

  • The Prince of Wales: 'If that is the future, count me out'
  • Relying on "gigantic corporations" for food, he said, would result in "absolute disaster".

    "That would be the absolute destruction of everything... and the classic way of ensuring there is no food in the future," he said.

    "What we should be talking about is food security not food production - that is what matters and that is what people will not understand.

    "And if they think its somehow going to work because they are going to have one form of clever genetic engineering after another then again count me out, because that will be guaranteed to cause the biggest disaster environmentally of all time."

    Small farmers, in particular, would be the victims of "gigantic corporations" taking over the mass production of food.

    "I think it's heading for real disaster," he said.

    "If they think this is the way to go....we [will] end up with millions of small farmers all over the world being driven off their land into unsustainable, unmanageable, degraded and dysfunctional conurbations of unmentionable awfulness."

    The Prince of Wales's forthright comments will reopen the whole debate about GM food.

    They will put him on a collision course with the international scientific community and Downing Street - which has allowed 54 GM crop trials in Britain since 2000.

    His intervention comes at a critical time. There is intense pressure for more GM products, not fewer, because of soaring food costs and widespread shortages.

    Many scientists believe GM research is the only way to guarantee food for the world's growing population as the planet is affected by climate change.

    They will be dismayed by such a high profile and controversial contribution from the Prince of Wales at such a sensitive time.

    The Prince will be braced for the biggest outpouring of criticism from scientists since he accused genetic engineers of taking us into "realms that belong to God and God alone" in an article in the Daily Telegraph in 1998.

    In the interview the Prince, who has an organic farm on his Highgrove estate, held out the hope of the British agricultural system encouraging more and more family run co-operative farms.

    When challenged over whether he was trying to turn back the clock, he said: "I think not. I'm terribly sorry. It's not going backwards. It is actually recognising that we are with nature, not against it. We have gone working against nature for too long."

    The Prince of Wales cited the widespread environmental damage in India caused by the rush to mass produce GM food.

    "Look at India's Green Revolution. It worked for a short time but now the price is being paid.

    "I have been to the Punjab where you have seen the disasters that have taken place as result of the over demand on irrigation because of the hybrid seeds and grains that have been produced which demand huge amounts of water.

    "[The] water table has disappeared. They have huge problems with water level, with pesticide problems, and complications which are now coming home to roost.

    "Look at western Australia. Huge salinisation problems. I have been there. Seen it. Some of the excessive approaches to modern forms of agriculture."

    He said that the scientists were putting too much pressure on nature.

    "If you are not working with natural assistance you cause untold problems. which become very expensive and very difficult to undo.

    It places impossible burdens on nature and leads to accumulating problems which become more difficult to sort out."

    In a keynote speech last year the Prince of Wales warned that the world faces a series of natural disasters within 18 months unless a £15 billion action plan is agreed to save the world's rain forests.

    He has set up his own rain forest project with 15 of the world's largest companies, environmental and economic experts, to try to find ways to stop their destruction.

    Only two weeks ago British GM researchers lobbied ministers for their crops to be kept in high-security facilities or in fields at secret locations across the country to prevent them from being attacked and destroyed.

    They spoke out after protesters ripped up crops in one of only two GM trials to be approved in Britain this year.

    Scientists claim the repeated attacks on their trials are stifling vital research to evaluate whether GM crops can reduce the cost and environmental impact of farming and whether they will grow better in harsh environments where droughts have devastated harvests.

    What's killing our honey bees?

    Where did all the honey bees go? Lily Barclay investigates why thousands of bees are being wiped out in the UK

    What is the problem with honey bees?

    A third of the UK’s honey bees did not survive this winter and spring. In the US and other European countries this little-understood phenomenon has been dubbed Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). No one fully understands why this is happening.

    What is Colony Collapse Disorder?

    Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) is used to describe the phenomenon in which worker bees from a colony or hive abruptly disappear, and the colony dies. It may be due to stress, or viruses, or a combination of both, or other causes. But no one fully understands the condition, as hives and colonies can collapse for other reasons, especially during the winter.

    CCD was first reported in North America in late 2006 where in some beekeepers saw losses of up to 95%. Today in the US overall honey bee losses of 36% have seen significant drops in the quantity of honey harvested. CCD has since spread and has been reported in Canada, Italy, Germany and France. However, despite beekeepers concerns it is yet to be officially confirmed in the UK by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

    Why does it matter?

    Unsurprisingly, fewer honeybees means less honey. Many experts believe that English honey will have run out by Christmas 2008, and will not be available again until 2009. The consequences for the agricultural economy could be significant - bees are reported to make an annual £165 million for the industry.

    But perhaps more crucially honeybees play a vital role within the planet’s ecosystem by pollinating many fruit and vegetables. We don’t fully understand the full consequences of their demise, but without bees many flowering plants would become extinct.

    These include most agricultural harvests making bees a critical link in the food chain. Bees pollinate about 80% of flowering crops – this amounts to a third of the food we eat, from raspberries to runner beans.

    Why is it happening?

    There are always natural dips in bees’ annual survival rate, and the average drop in numbers over the winter period varies between 5% and 10%. This year the British Beekeepers Association (BBA) reported that more than 30% of honey bees didn’t survive the winter and spring.

    There are many possible explanations for this, but the cause of the crisis is still a mystery. Some experts believe there is no single reason but a combination of factors.

    The wet summer of 2007 restricted bees to their hives. This did not leave them enough opportunity to forage for nectar to see them through the winter months. Malnutrition weakens the bees’ immune systems and heightens stress in the hive. This in turn makes them vulnerable to mites and disease such as varroatosis and nosemosis, which has been compounded again by this year’s wet spring.

    A host of manmade issues have also been cited as the possible causes. These include urban growth, GM crops, global warming and even mobile phone radiation. Many beekeepers believe that the misuse of pesticides disorientates bees’ and affects their ability to find their way back to the hive.

    Possible solutions

    The BBA want Defra to fund an £8m research programme over five years. The programme would investigate the growing depletion of bees in the UK. The government currently spends £200,000 on bee research. Critics argue that this is well out of sync with the reported £165m a year that bees contribute to the agricultural economy.

    The UK’s largest honey company ‘Rowse’ is sufficiently concerned about the crisis to donate 10p from every jar of honey sold to honeybee research.

    In August 2008 Chris Hartfield, horticultural adviser for the National Farmers’ Union told the Guardian, “Research is vital into varroa, bee breeding and the Nosema parasite - we are talking about food security and world food supplies being put at risk.”

    Tapping the hot asphalt jungle for energy
    Posted by Martin LaMonica
    Pavement, it turns out, is a pretty good place to look for free energy.

    A handful of Massachusetts researchers on Monday published a paper detailing a technique for using water-carrying pipes to convert the built-up heat in asphalt roads into usable energy.

    Researchers measure ways to transfer heat from a source, such as this lamp shining over asphalt, to water. (Credit: Worcester Polytechnic Institute)

    Released at the International Symposium on Asphalt Pavements and Environment in Zurich, Switzerland, the paper argues that asphalt roads have a number of advantages over solar-electric panels as a source of distributed energy.

    "The significance of this concept lies in the fact that the massive installed base of parking lots and roadways creates a low-cost solar collector an order of magnitude more productive than traditional solar cells. The significantly high surface area can offset the expected lower efficiency (compared to traditional solar cells) by several orders of magnitude, and hence result in significantly lower cost per unit of power produced," according to the paper.

    Blacktops can continue to generate energy after the sun goes down, and upgrades with heat exchangers could be fit into road constructions, which are done every 10 to 12 years, Rajib Mallick, associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, said in a statement.

    Also, wicking heat away from roads could reduce the "heat island" effect in densely populated areas where temperatures rise when buildings and pavement release heat accumulated during the day.

    The researchers used computer modeling and small-scale prototypes to test alternatives to pipes for transferring asphalt heat to water.

    It found that the depth of the heat exchanger was critical and that a material with higher heat conductivity, such as quartzite, can be added to asphalt to improve heat transfer.

    The hot water from the roads could be used in neighboring buildings, something that has already been done in the Netherlands. A more sophisticated approach would be to convert the heat into electricity using thermoelectric modules.

    "Our preliminary results provide a promising proof of concept for what could be a very important future source of renewable, pollution-free energy for our nation. And it has been there all along, right under our feet," Mallick said.

    Quote of the week
    The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
    - Andrew S. Tannenbaum

    Technology Corner
    Flexible Nanoantenna Arrays Capture Abundant Solar Energy
    ScienceDaily (Aug. 12, 2008) — Researchers have devised an inexpensive way to produce plastic sheets containing billions of nanoantennas that collect heat energy generated by the sun and other sources. The technology, developed at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory, is the first step toward a solar energy collector that could be mass-produced on flexible materials.

    While methods to convert the energy into usable electricity still need to be developed, the sheets could one day be manufactured as lightweight "skins" that power everything from hybrid cars to iPods with higher efficiency than traditional solar cells, say the researchers, who report their findings Aug. 13 at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2008 2nd International Conference on Energy Sustainability in Jacksonville, Fla. The nanoantennas also have the potential to act as cooling devices that draw waste heat from buildings or electronics without using electricity.

    The nanoantennas target mid-infrared rays, which the Earth continuously radiates as heat after absorbing energy from the sun during the day. In contrast, traditional solar cells can only use visible light, rendering them idle after dark. Infrared radiation is an especially rich energy source because it also is generated by industrial processes such as coal-fired plants.

    "Every process in our industrial world creates waste heat," says INL physicist Steven Novack. "It's energy that we just throw away." Novack led the research team, which included INL engineer Dale Kotter, W. Dennis Slafer of MicroContinuum, Inc. (Cambridge, Mass.) and Patrick Pinhero, now at the University of Missouri.

    The nanoantennas are tiny gold squares or spirals set in a specially treated form of polyethylene, a material used in plastic bags. While others have successfully invented antennas that collect energy from lower-frequency regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as microwaves, infrared rays have proven more elusive. Part of the reason is that materials' properties change drastically at high-frequency wavelengths, Kotter says.

    The researchers studied the behavior of various materials -- including gold, manganese and copper -- under infrared rays and used the resulting data to build computer models of nanoantennas. They found that with the right materials, shape and size, the simulated nanoantennas could harvest up to 92 percent of the energy at infrared wavelengths.

    The team then created real-life prototypes to test their computer models. First, they used conventional production methods to etch a silicon wafer with the nanoantenna pattern. The silicon-based nanoantennas matched the computer simulations, absorbing more than 80 percent of the energy over the intended wavelength range. Next, they used a stamp-and-repeat process to emboss the nanoantennas on thin sheets of plastic. While the plastic prototype is still being tested, initial experiments suggest that it also captures energy at the expected infrared wavelengths.

    The nanoantennas' ability to absorb infrared radiation makes them promising cooling devices. Since objects give off heat as infrared rays, the nanoantennas could collect those rays and re-emit the energy at harmless wavelengths. Such a system could cool down buildings and computers without the external power source required by air-conditioners and fans.

    But more technological advances are needed before the nanoantennas can funnel their energy into usable electricity. The infrared rays create alternating currents in the nanoantennas that oscillate trillions of times per second, requiring a component called a rectifier to convert the alternating current to direct current. Today's rectifiers can't handle such high frequencies. "We need to design nanorectifiers that go with our nanoantennas," says Kotter, noting that a nanoscale rectifier would need to be about 1,000 times smaller than current commercial devices and will require new manufacturing methods. Another possibility is to develop electrical circuitry that might slow down the current to usable frequencies.

    If these technical hurdles can be overcome, nanoantennas have the potential to be a cheaper, more efficient alternative to solar cells. Traditional solar cells rely on a chemical reaction that only works for up to 20 percent of the visible light they collect. Scientists have developed more complex solar cells with higher efficiency, but these models are too expensive for widespread use.

    Nanoantennas, on the other hand, can be tweaked to pick up specific wavelengths depending on their shape and size. This flexibility would make it possible to create double-sided nanoantenna sheets that harvest energy from different parts of the sun's spectrum, Novack says. The team's stamp-and-repeat process could also be extended to large-scale roll-to-roll manufacturing techniques that could print the arrays at a rate of several yards per minute. The sheets could potentially cover building roofs or form the "skin" of consumer gadgets like cell phones and iPods, providing a continuous and inexpensive source of renewable energy.

     
    Daily Energy Prices

     
    New Zealand Daily Storage Graph