Water buyouts to ease Murray River anger
Jamie Walker August 15, 2008 |
|
THE Government will offer to buy out the water entitlements of entire irrigation communities as Kevin Rudd moved yesterday to appease growing outrage at the plight of the lower Murray River.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24183641-11949,00.htmlThe Prime Minister also caved in to demands for an external audit of water remaining in the drought-ravaged Murray-Darling Basin that spans Queensland, NSW, Victoria and South Australia. Federal cabinet, meeting in Adelaide, a centre of the unfolding crisis, signed off on $50million in additional spending to accelerate the buyback of water rights, which has so far had minimal impact. But the Opposition dismissed the package as "paper money", while South Australia's balance-of-power senator Nick Xenophon said it did not go far enough. Under the deal, the federal Government will work with the states to acquire irrigation properties with large-scale water entitlements, especially in the upper reaches of the basin in NSW and Queensland. This would build on a program trialed successfully in NSW, a spokeswoman for Water Minister Penny Wong said. As well, Mr Rudd said the commonweath was willing to acquire the water entitlements of whole communities. But there was "no magic solution" to the emergency engulfing the lower Murray in South Australia, he warned. "I am not going to provide false promises, I am not going to provide false guarantees about there being some simple solution here," he said. "I am trying to turn around a situation which has evolved over many years ... and we are dealing with the real consequences of climate change." Describing the river system as "very stressed", Mr Rudd said the Government was taking practical measures to accelerate and increase the buyback of water entitlements, which had been grossly over-allocated outside South Australia. Central to the plan is expansion of a $350million offer for water rights in southern Queensland, where the headwaters of the Murray-Darling system are located. The $50million in additional funding approved by cabinet yesterday will take the program to $400million and extend it through NSW to the Menindee lakes, near Broken Hill, a back-up reservoir of drinking water for that town as well as Adelaide. Mr Rudd played down the prospect of compulsory acquisition of water rights, saying "we are working within the market". The effectiveness of the existing water buyback scheme was sharply drawn into question last week, when The Australian reported that it would return barely 10 megalitres to the river this year - the equivalent of 10 Olympic swimming pools. Senator Wong's office said last night expenditure of the allocated funds would depend on the take-up of offers by irrigators and communities willing to cash in their water rights. At the same time, pressure on the lower Murray would be eased by Mr Rudd's offer to co-fund with South Australia an expansion of Adelaide's new water desalination plant. The project, currently costed at $1.1 billion, is to provide 50 gigalitres of drinking water annually to Adelaide, about a quarter of the city's needs. Mr Rudd said the commonwealth would partner the South Australian Government to increase the plant's capacity to up to 100 gigalitres. Premier Mike Rann did not immediately commit to the expansion. His office said last night the state Government was considering the proposal, though Mr Rann noted yesterday there was provision in the design to accommodate it. Mr Rudd said he wanted to end debate over whether there were untapped water reserves in the Murray-Darling Basin, which could be reallocated to top up the lower lakes at the mouth of the Murray. The two waterways, Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert, could become acidic within months unless inflows drastically increase. Last week, the Murray-Darling Basin Commission backed up Senator Wong's grim assessment that there was not enough water in the river system to provide volumes required to fill the lower lakes. The river management agency reported that publicly controlled reserves of water had fallen to 4800 gigalitres, just a fifth of stored capacity across the basin. This has been challenged in South Australia by communities on the lower lakes and by some water experts, who dispute the accuracy of data supplied to the commission. Mr Rudd said estimates of publicly and privately owned water reserves in the basin would be checked by private auditors. Updates would be released quarterly. Senator Xenophon, whose vote is needed by the Government to pass legislation opposed by the Coalition, yesterday backed a proposal by the Greens to hold a Senate inquiry into the issue. "I've got real concerns about what is being proposed," he said. "What we need is an independent forensic audit which details where the water is, who controls it and what the best use of the water is." Opposition climate change and environment spokesman Greg Hunt accused Mr Rudd of "running up Penny Wong's white flag" on the lower lakes. The latest Murray package was "paper money" which would not deliver results, he said. Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists director Peter Cosier said Mr Rudd had recognised the magnitude of the crisis. Inland Rivers Network coordinator Amy Hankinson said the additional money was a good sign but more was needed to arrest the decline of the Murray-Darling Basin. Mr Rudd said federal cabinet had agreed to back the flooding of the lower lakes with seawater as a last-ditch measure to stave off acidification. The South Australian Government has begun site preparation for a weir, upstream of the lakes, to implement the measure. |
|
Tuvalu, a small island nation in the Pacific
make Poverty History report
Tuvalu, a small island nation in the Pacifc, has in recent years lost about one metre of land around the circumference of its largest atoll due to changes in storm conditions and rising sea levels.
Tuvalu is one of the world’s lowest lying countries, with its highest point standing a mere four and a half metres above sea level. Half of Tuvalu’s population of 11,000 people live just three metres above sea level. “We live in constant fear of the adverse impacts of climate change. For a coral atoll nation, the sea level rising and more severe weather events loom as a growing threat to our entire population. The threat is real and serious, and is of no difference to a slow and insidious form of terrorism against us.” Saufatu Sopoanga, Prime Minister of Tuvalu Salt-water intrusion reduces the land’s productive capabilities and has already affected communal crop gardens on six of Tuvalu’s eight islands. Some families have taken to growing taro (root staple) in metal buckets to avoid the saline soils. In addition, the increased coral bleaching from rising ocean temperatures is depleting local fsh stocks. Tuvalu is the frst country where residents have been forced to evacuate because of rising sea levels – with nearly 3000 Tuvaluans already evacuated.“Taking us as environmental refugees is not what Tuvalu is after in the long run. We want the islands of Tuvalu and our nation to remain permanently and not be submerged as a result of greed and uncontrolled consumption of industrialised countries. We want our children to grow up the way we grew up in our own islands and in our own culture.”Tuvaluan Governor-General Sir Tomasi Papuas Climate change is real and happening right now. Within our region, people living on low lying islands and river deltas are already experiencing negative impacts of rising seas and salt water inundation which contribute to crop losses, destruction of fresh water sources, and fooding. For these people climate change is already a stark reality and a terrifying future.
In the Western world we are slowly coming to demand more action on climate change. In 2006 the world watched Al Gore’s flm, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’. In 2007 the Nobel Peace Prize was jointly shared by Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In the same year climate change played a signifcant role in the Australian Federal Election. Most recently, in July 2008, Professor Garnaut released his Draft Report on climate change, outlining Australia’s response. Calling climate change a ‘diabolical policy problem…harder than any other issue of high importance that has come before our polity in living memory’, he urges Australia and the world to take urgent action before it is too late. However, despite these events and the broad recognition that climate change is a defning challenge of our generation, we are still lacking suffcient public debate on climate change from development and poverty perspectives. Within Australia, the focus still remains on largely domestic issues, without due consideration of issues affecting poor women and men in developing nations. Make Poverty History hopes that this publication and its national campaign can change the debate to better inform the public, business and decision makers to see the bigger picture – and act on climate change.
Climate change is already beginning to undermine poverty reduction and sustainable development objectives under the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and is set to get worse. It cuts across all development issues and seriously threatens the lives and livelihoods of poor people around the world. It affects all sectors of development, from food and water security, to health and sanitation, to displacement and migration, and confict and disasters. Developing countries are more vulnerable to climate change because they are more dependent on their natural resources than developed countries, and have a lower capacity to cope with environmental hazards and shocks. The debates on climate change, and Australia’s reponse, must include issues of social justice, equity and responsibility, in addition to science and economics. For poor people in developing countries who currently lack a voice these issues are a matterof life and death. Their voices must be heard in order for international policy to refect their real needs, and not just the economic arguments. The reality is that climate change is one of the biggest moral and ethical issues facing our planet today. How we rise to the challenge of asking andanswering the ethical questions, will play a signifcant part in determining the future of the world’s poor. To read the full report click HERE (pdf) |
|---|
|
Half of All Food Produced Worldwide is Wasted
STOCKHOLM, Sweden, August 22, 2008 (ENS)
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tremendous quantities of food are wasted after production - discarded in processing, transport, supermarkets and kitchens - and this wasted food is also wasted water, finds a policy brief released Thursday at World Water Week in Stockholm.
The brief authored by the Stockholm International Water Institute, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, and the International Water Management Institute shows that the current food crisis is less a crisis of production than a crisis of waste. Tossing food away is like leaving the tap running, the authors say. "More than enough food is produced to feed a healthy global population. Distribution and access to food is a problem - many are hungry, while at the same time many overeat," the brief states. But, it says, "we are providing food to take care of not only our necessary consumption but also our wasteful habits."
"As much as half of the water used to grow food globally may be lost or wasted," says Dr. Charlotte de Fraiture, a researcher at IWMI. "Curbing these losses and improving water productivity provides win-win opportunities for farmers, business, ecosystems, and the global hungry." "An effective water-saving strategy requires that minimizing food wastage is firmly placed on the political agenda," she said. In the United States, for instance, as much as 30 percent of food, worth some US$48.3 billion, is thrown away. "That's like leaving the tap running and pouring 40 trillion liters of water into the garbage can - enough water to meet the household needs of 500 million people," says the report. The policy brief, "Saving Water: From Field to Fork - Curbing Losses and Wastage in the Food Chain," calls on governments to reduce by half, by 2025, the amount of food that is wasted after it is grown and outlines attainable steps for this be achieved. Through international trade, for instance, savings in one country might benefit communities in other parts of the world. "Unless we change our practices, water will be a key constraint to food production in the future," said Dr. Pasquale Steduto of FAO. Water losses accumulate as food is wasted before and after it reaches the consumer. In poorer countries, a majority of uneaten food is lost before it has a chance to be consumed. Depending on the crop, an estimated 15 to 35 percent of food may be lost in the field. Another 10 to15 percent is discarded during processing, transport and storage, the brief states.
As this wasted food rots in landfills it generates methane, a gas that causes climate change and is 21 times more potent than carbon dioxide. The report stresses that the magnitude of current food losses presents both challenges and opportunities. "Improving water productivity and reducing the quantity of food that is wasted can enable us to provide a better diet for the poor and enough food for growing populations," says Professor Jan Lundqvist of the Stockholm International Water Institute. "Reaching the target we propose, a 50 percent reduction of losses and wastage in the production and consumption chain is a necessary and achievable goal," said Lundqvist. World Water Week is hosted by the Stockholm International Water Institute, a policy institute that contributes to international efforts to combat the world's escalating water crisis. The annual event features the award of the 2008 Stockholm Water Prize, which this year was bestowed upon Professor John Anthony Allan from King's College London, who introduced the "virtual water" concept. Virtual water is a measurement of how water is embedded in the production and trade of food and consumer products and is the concept on which the policy brief, "Saving Water: From Field to Fork - Curbing Losses and Wastage in the Food Chain," is based. While studying water scarcity in the Middle East, Professor Allan developed the theory of using virtual water import, via food, as an alternative water "source" to reduce pressure on the scarcely available domestic water resources there and in other water-short regions.
By explaining how and why nations such as the United States, Argentina and Brazil export billions of liters of water each year, while others like Japan, Egypt and Italy import billions, the virtual water concept has opened the door to more productive water use, said the Water Prize Nominating Committee. National, regional and global water and food security, for example, can be enhanced when water intensive commodities are traded from places where they are economically viable to produce to places where they are not. "The improved understanding of trade and water management issues on local, regional and global scales are of the highest relevance for the successful and sustainable use of water resources," the committee said. The Stockholm Water Prize is a global award founded in 1990 and presented annually by the Stockholm Water Foundation to an individual, organization or institution for outstanding water-related activities. The activities can be within fields like education and awareness-raising, human and international relations, research, water management and water-related aid. The Stockholm Water Prize Laureate receives US$150,000 and a crystal sculpture. H.M. King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden is the Patron of the Stockholm Water Prize. Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights reserved. |
Pollution leaves seas to die
Lewis Smith August 16, 2008 |
|
AQUATIC dead zones, stretches of water where little or nothing can survive, have increased across the world by a third in little over a decade.
More than 400 dead zones were identified last year, covering a total area of 64,700sq km, about the size of New Zealand. The dead zones suffer from hypoxia, a lack of oxygen, which scientists believe is caused by fertilisers washing off the land. When hypoxia sets in, it can drive away tens of thousands of marine animals and, in severe cases, kill them. Scientists believe that hypoxia ranks with overfishing and habitat destruction as one of the most damaging problems facing sealife. Since the 1960s, when there were 49 dead zones, the number has increased rapidly and from 1995 to last year it rose from 305 to 405. Among the most alarming outbreaks of hypoxia were in fishing areas of the Baltic, the Black Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and the East China Sea. One of the largest was identified at the mouth of the Mississippi River and was 22,000sq km. "Dead zones were once rare. Now they're commonplace. There are more of them in more places," said Robert Diaz, of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, in the US. In a paper published in the journal Science, Professor Diaz and his colleague Rutger Rosenberg, of the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, said that dead zones "now rank with overfishing, habitat loss and harmful algal blooms as major global environmental problems". They wrote: "There is no other variable of such ecological importance to coastal marine ecosystems that has changed so drastically over such a short time." According to the scientists, the dead zones occur when nutrients used to enhance farmland, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, wash into the sea and fertilise huge blooms of algae. When dead, the algae are eaten by bacteria, which absorb oxygen from the water as the algae decompose. |
Prince Charles warns GM crops risk causing the biggest-ever environmental disaster
By Jeff Randall
|
|
The mass development of genetically modified crops risks causing the world's worst environmental disaster, The Prince of Wales has warned. In his most outspoken intervention on the issue of GM food, the Prince said that multi-national companies were conducting an experiment with nature which had gone "seriously wrong". Relying on "gigantic corporations" for food, he said, would result in "absolute disaster". "That would be the absolute destruction of everything... and the classic way of ensuring there is no food in the future," he said. "What we should be talking about is food security not food production - that is what matters and that is what people will not understand. "And if they think its somehow going to work because they are going to have one form of clever genetic engineering after another then again count me out, because that will be guaranteed to cause the biggest disaster environmentally of all time." Small farmers, in particular, would be the victims of "gigantic corporations" taking over the mass production of food. "I think it's heading for real disaster," he said. "If they think this is the way to go....we [will] end up with millions of small farmers all over the world being driven off their land into unsustainable, unmanageable, degraded and dysfunctional conurbations of unmentionable awfulness." The Prince of Wales's forthright comments will reopen the whole debate about GM food. They will put him on a collision course with the international scientific community and Downing Street - which has allowed 54 GM crop trials in Britain since 2000. His intervention comes at a critical time. There is intense pressure for more GM products, not fewer, because of soaring food costs and widespread shortages. Many scientists believe GM research is the only way to guarantee food for the world's growing population as the planet is affected by climate change. They will be dismayed by such a high profile and controversial contribution from the Prince of Wales at such a sensitive time. The Prince will be braced for the biggest outpouring of criticism from scientists since he accused genetic engineers of taking us into "realms that belong to God and God alone" in an article in the Daily Telegraph in 1998. In the interview the Prince, who has an organic farm on his Highgrove estate, held out the hope of the British agricultural system encouraging more and more family run co-operative farms. When challenged over whether he was trying to turn back the clock, he said: "I think not. I'm terribly sorry. It's not going backwards. It is actually recognising that we are with nature, not against it. We have gone working against nature for too long." The Prince of Wales cited the widespread environmental damage in India caused by the rush to mass produce GM food. "Look at India's Green Revolution. It worked for a short time but now the price is being paid. "I have been to the Punjab where you have seen the disasters that have taken place as result of the over demand on irrigation because of the hybrid seeds and grains that have been produced which demand huge amounts of water. "[The] water table has disappeared. They have huge problems with water level, with pesticide problems, and complications which are now coming home to roost. "Look at western Australia. Huge salinisation problems. I have been there. Seen it. Some of the excessive approaches to modern forms of agriculture." He said that the scientists were putting too much pressure on nature. "If you are not working with natural assistance you cause untold problems. which become very expensive and very difficult to undo. It places impossible burdens on nature and leads to accumulating problems which become more difficult to sort out." In a keynote speech last year the Prince of Wales warned that the world faces a series of natural disasters within 18 months unless a £15 billion action plan is agreed to save the world's rain forests. He has set up his own rain forest project with 15 of the world's largest companies, environmental and economic experts, to try to find ways to stop their destruction. Only two weeks ago British GM researchers lobbied ministers for their crops to be kept in high-security facilities or in fields at secret locations across the country to prevent them from being attacked and destroyed. They spoke out after protesters ripped up crops in one of only two GM trials to be approved in Britain this year. Scientists claim the repeated attacks on their trials are stifling vital research to evaluate whether GM crops can reduce the cost and environmental impact of farming and whether they will grow better in harsh environments where droughts have devastated harvests. |
|
What's killing our honey bees?
|
|---|
What is the problem with honey bees?A third of the UK’s honey bees did not survive this winter and spring. In the US and other European countries this little-understood phenomenon has been dubbed Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). No one fully understands why this is happening. What is Colony Collapse Disorder?Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) is used to describe the phenomenon in which worker bees from a colony or hive abruptly disappear, and the colony dies. It may be due to stress, or viruses, or a combination of both, or other causes. But no one fully understands the condition, as hives and colonies can collapse for other reasons, especially during the winter. Why does it matter?Unsurprisingly, fewer honeybees means less honey. Many experts believe that English honey will have run out by Christmas 2008, and will not be available again until 2009. The consequences for the agricultural economy could be significant - bees are reported to make an annual £165 million for the industry. Why is it happening?There are always natural dips in bees’ annual survival rate, and the average drop in numbers over the winter period varies between 5% and 10%. This year the British Beekeepers Association (BBA) reported that more than 30% of honey bees didn’t survive the winter and spring. Possible solutionsThe BBA want Defra to fund an £8m research programme over five years. The programme would investigate the growing depletion of bees in the UK. The government currently spends £200,000 on bee research. Critics argue that this is well out of sync with the reported £165m a year that bees contribute to the agricultural economy. |
|
Tapping the hot asphalt jungle for energy
Posted by Martin LaMonica
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Pavement, it turns out, is a pretty good place to look for free energy.
A handful of Massachusetts researchers on Monday published a paper detailing a technique for using water-carrying pipes to convert the built-up heat in asphalt roads into usable energy.
Released at the International Symposium on Asphalt Pavements and Environment in Zurich, Switzerland, the paper argues that asphalt roads have a number of advantages over solar-electric panels as a source of distributed energy. "The significance of this concept lies in the fact that the massive installed base of parking lots and roadways creates a low-cost solar collector an order of magnitude more productive than traditional solar cells. The significantly high surface area can offset the expected lower efficiency (compared to traditional solar cells) by several orders of magnitude, and hence result in significantly lower cost per unit of power produced," according to the paper. Blacktops can continue to generate energy after the sun goes down, and upgrades with heat exchangers could be fit into road constructions, which are done every 10 to 12 years, Rajib Mallick, associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, said in a statement. Also, wicking heat away from roads could reduce the "heat island" effect in densely populated areas where temperatures rise when buildings and pavement release heat accumulated during the day. The researchers used computer modeling and small-scale prototypes to test alternatives to pipes for transferring asphalt heat to water. It found that the depth of the heat exchanger was critical and that a material with higher heat conductivity, such as quartzite, can be added to asphalt to improve heat transfer. The hot water from the roads could be used in neighboring buildings, something that has already been done in the Netherlands. A more sophisticated approach would be to convert the heat into electricity using thermoelectric modules. "Our preliminary results provide a promising proof of concept for what could be a very important future source of renewable, pollution-free energy for our nation. And it has been there all along, right under our feet," Mallick said. |
Quote of the week |
|
The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. - Andrew S. Tannenbaum |
Technology Corner
Flexible Nanoantenna Arrays Capture Abundant Solar Energy
|
|
ScienceDaily (Aug. 12, 2008) — Researchers have devised an inexpensive way to produce plastic sheets containing billions of nanoantennas that collect heat energy generated by the sun and other sources. The technology, developed at the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory, is the first step toward a solar energy collector that could be mass-produced on flexible materials.
While methods to convert the energy into usable electricity still need to be developed, the sheets could one day be manufactured as lightweight "skins" that power everything from hybrid cars to iPods with higher efficiency than traditional solar cells, say the researchers, who report their findings Aug. 13 at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2008 2nd International Conference on Energy Sustainability in Jacksonville, Fla. The nanoantennas also have the potential to act as cooling devices that draw waste heat from buildings or electronics without using electricity. The nanoantennas target mid-infrared rays, which the Earth continuously radiates as heat after absorbing energy from the sun during the day. In contrast, traditional solar cells can only use visible light, rendering them idle after dark. Infrared radiation is an especially rich energy source because it also is generated by industrial processes such as coal-fired plants. "Every process in our industrial world creates waste heat," says INL physicist Steven Novack. "It's energy that we just throw away." Novack led the research team, which included INL engineer Dale Kotter, W. Dennis Slafer of MicroContinuum, Inc. (Cambridge, Mass.) and Patrick Pinhero, now at the University of Missouri. The nanoantennas are tiny gold squares or spirals set in a specially treated form of polyethylene, a material used in plastic bags. While others have successfully invented antennas that collect energy from lower-frequency regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as microwaves, infrared rays have proven more elusive. Part of the reason is that materials' properties change drastically at high-frequency wavelengths, Kotter says. The researchers studied the behavior of various materials -- including gold, manganese and copper -- under infrared rays and used the resulting data to build computer models of nanoantennas. They found that with the right materials, shape and size, the simulated nanoantennas could harvest up to 92 percent of the energy at infrared wavelengths. The team then created real-life prototypes to test their computer models. First, they used conventional production methods to etch a silicon wafer with the nanoantenna pattern. The silicon-based nanoantennas matched the computer simulations, absorbing more than 80 percent of the energy over the intended wavelength range. Next, they used a stamp-and-repeat process to emboss the nanoantennas on thin sheets of plastic. While the plastic prototype is still being tested, initial experiments suggest that it also captures energy at the expected infrared wavelengths. The nanoantennas' ability to absorb infrared radiation makes them promising cooling devices. Since objects give off heat as infrared rays, the nanoantennas could collect those rays and re-emit the energy at harmless wavelengths. Such a system could cool down buildings and computers without the external power source required by air-conditioners and fans. But more technological advances are needed before the nanoantennas can funnel their energy into usable electricity. The infrared rays create alternating currents in the nanoantennas that oscillate trillions of times per second, requiring a component called a rectifier to convert the alternating current to direct current. Today's rectifiers can't handle such high frequencies. "We need to design nanorectifiers that go with our nanoantennas," says Kotter, noting that a nanoscale rectifier would need to be about 1,000 times smaller than current commercial devices and will require new manufacturing methods. Another possibility is to develop electrical circuitry that might slow down the current to usable frequencies. If these technical hurdles can be overcome, nanoantennas have the potential to be a cheaper, more efficient alternative to solar cells. Traditional solar cells rely on a chemical reaction that only works for up to 20 percent of the visible light they collect. Scientists have developed more complex solar cells with higher efficiency, but these models are too expensive for widespread use. Nanoantennas, on the other hand, can be tweaked to pick up specific wavelengths depending on their shape and size. This flexibility would make it possible to create double-sided nanoantenna sheets that harvest energy from different parts of the sun's spectrum, Novack says. The team's stamp-and-repeat process could also be extended to large-scale roll-to-roll manufacturing techniques that could print the arrays at a rate of several yards per minute. The sheets could potentially cover building roofs or form the "skin" of consumer gadgets like cell phones and iPods, providing a continuous and inexpensive source of renewable energy. |
Daily Energy Prices
|
|---|
New Zealand Daily Storage Graph
|
|---|